Legal Opinion
Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1968No. Nos. 21869, 21870 and 21870-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Valley Vision, Inc. (Valley) operates a community antenna television system (CATV) at Plaeerville, California. It began operations on September 30, 1966. It brings to its subscribers the signals of television stations in Sacramento, San Francisco, Modesto, and Chico, California. On February 17, 1967, the Federal Communications Commission issued an order directing Valley to show cause why it should not be ordered to cease and desist from extending the signals of distant TV stations in violation of sections 74.1105 and 74.1107 of the rules adopted by the Commission…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Functional Music, Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, (Two Cases). Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968