Legal Opinion

Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, (Two Cases). Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1968No. 21870_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

399 F.2d 511

VALLEY VISION, INC., Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents (two cases).

VALLEY VISION, INC., Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 21869.

No. 21870.

No. 21870-A.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 27, 1968.

Lauren A. Colby (argued), Gennaro D. Caliendo, Washington, D. C., Halley, Head, LaForce & Moorad, Modesto, Cal., for petitioners.

John H. Conlin (argued), Koteen & Burt, Covington & Burling, Howard E. Shapiro, Acting Chief, App. Section, Henry Geller, Gen. Counsel, F. C. C., Wm. Fishman,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Functional Music, Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API