Legal Opinion

Metzner v. Bauer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1884No. 11,353PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Separate demurrers of the appellees were sustained by the court below to. the appellants’ complaint, and these rulings are assigned as error.

The facts alleged in the complaint, so far as it is material to state them, were substantially as follows:

John P. Zimmerman, of Jefferson county, Kentucky, died testate, and his will was duly admitted to probate. By his will, the appellant Matthaeus Metzner, a son of the testator’s *426sister, the appellee Kunigunda, a daughter of the testator’s brother, since intermarried with the appellee George Bauer, and others' were made legatees. The will provided that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Runk v. St. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Martin v. WoodruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Smith v. ZentIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Whitlock v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Baldwin v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Thompson v. ReasonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Broadway National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API