Martin v. Woodruff
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Lagrange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
This was an action of assumpsit for *238money had and received, in which Woodruff was the plaintiff and Martin defendant.
Plea — the general issue. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
The facts are as follow: One Thomas Atchison had recovered a judgment for 71 dollars against Jonathan Woodruff, the now plaintiff. In November, 1843, a fieri facias issued on said judgment, which was levied on the property of said Woodruff. In February, 1844, the judgment-plaintiff, Atchison, assigned the judgment to said Martin, who was the clerk of the Court. In August, 1844, a part of the property levied on as…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Thompson v. ReasonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Reese v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.