Legal Opinion

Martin v. Woodruff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1850PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the Lagrange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of assumpsit for *238money had and received, in which Woodruff was the plaintiff and Martin defendant.

Plea — the general issue. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The facts are as follow: One Thomas Atchison had recovered a judgment for 71 dollars against Jonathan Woodruff, the now plaintiff. In November, 1843, a fieri facias issued on said judgment, which was levied on the property of said Woodruff. In February, 1844, the judgment-plaintiff, Atchison, assigned the judgment to said Martin, who was the clerk of the Court. In August, 1844, a part of the property levied on as…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Thompson v. ReasonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Reese v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API