Legal Opinion

Baxley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1993No. 538PA91, 226PA92PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

This case involves two issues. The first issue is whether the underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier in this case is obligated to pay prejudgment interest on the compensatory damages award of the jury in the underlying tort action by its'insured against the tort-feasor. We conclude that the UIM carrier is obligated to pay prejudgment interest on the award up to its policy limits. The second issue is whether the UIM carrier is entitled to a credit under the UIM coverage section for a payment it made to its insured under the medical payments section of the insurance contract. We hold…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API