Legal Opinion

Mitnacht v. Hawthorne

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to strike out a reply.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynob, J.:

The pleadings here are a fine sample of the way of pleading which has become the vogue in ¡New York county, and which is such an annoyance to trial judges. It is quite impossible to make out what issue they present without a laborious scrutiny of them. The action is in ejectment. Instead of a complaint in scientific form that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of the property, we have a long paper called a complaint which purports to set out the history and chain of the plaintiff’s title, which is a matter of evidence and not of pleading. Then comes the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flack v. O'BrienNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McManus v. Western Assurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Green v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kelly v. SammisNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. von Hagen v. Waterbury Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Territory v. Kitabayashis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Brown v. FishNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dickson v. NilesNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Pigot v. McKeeverNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API