Flack v. O'Brien
New York Supreme Court
Motion for leave to serve an amended answer.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
An inspection of the proposed amended answer which the defendant asks leave to serve, leads me to deny the motion. The said proposed answer starts out by pleading admissions and denials of certain allegations of the complaint as a “ defense.” As strange as this may seem, it is not at all unusual. The science of pleading seems to be quite lost in this state. The distinction between a “ denial ” and a “ defense ” scarcely remains. The form of this proposed answer is as follows: .
“For a first defense:
He admits the allegations contained in the paragraph marked first in said complaint contained.”
*400Th…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stuber v. . McEnteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cruikshank v. Press Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900
- Kelly v. SammisNew York Supreme Court · 1898
- von Hagen v. Waterbury Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898
- Slovenic National Benefit Society v. DabcevichArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Mitnacht v. HawthorneNew York Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.