Legal Opinion
Dickson v. Niles
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1924Published
1Opinion of the CourtAngell, J.
The action is to recover a balance claimed to be due plaintiff upon a conditional contract for the sale of two automobile trucks to defendants. As one of the defenses to the action, defendants set forth in their answer that plaintiff took possession of the trucks under the Personal Property Law, and sold them, and that because of the actions of plaintiff in connection therewith, the claim set forth in the complaint has been released and the cause of action satisfied.
It appears that subsequent to the service of the complaint, the *741UH‘end:mvs, setting forth by ufii>.h¡\itthe acts ceguj-ding the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. . Homestead Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Westminster Presbyterian Church of West Twentythird Street v. Trustees of PresbyteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Pattat v. PattatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Davis Confectionery Co. v. Rochester German InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Babcock v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.