Mid-Century Insurance v. Henault
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
— Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century) appeals from a court of appeals decision reversing a trial court’s order in which it granted summary judgment to Mid-Century on the basis that Christine Henault (Henault) was not covered under the uninsured or under-insured motorist (UIM) provisions of her Mid-Century automobile insurance policy (the policy). Henault sustained injuries when she was struck by an uninsured/ underinsured motorist as she lay in the roadway after having been ejected from her uninsured motorcycle in an earlier collision. Mid-Century contends that the policy’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Stuart v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stuart v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.