Legal Opinion

Mid-Century Insurance v. Henault

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1995No. 62259-1PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

— Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century) appeals from a court of appeals decision reversing a trial court’s order in which it granted summary judgment to Mid-Century on the basis that Christine Henault (Henault) was not covered under the uninsured or under-insured motorist (UIM) provisions of her Mid-Century automobile insurance policy (the policy). Henault sustained injuries when she was struck by an uninsured/ underinsured motorist as she lay in the roadway after having been ejected from her uninsured motorcycle in an earlier collision. Mid-Century contends that the policy’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Stuart v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Stuart v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API