Legal Opinion
United States v. Boldin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 27, 1985No. 84-8672PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires that we determine whether the present prosecution of the appellants on Title 21 drug charges (substantive and conspiracy), RICO substantive charges, RICO conspiracy charges, Travel Act charges, and continuing criminal enterprise charges is barred because the appellants were formerly put in jeopardy or should have been prosecuted in earlier cases. Finding no double jeopardy bar, we affirm.
On January 19, 1984, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against thirty individuals for violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, 18…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. CaporaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy SweetonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.