Legal Opinion

Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 31, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 2968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BIGGS, Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT and STEEL, District Judges. STEEL, District Judge:

This action was brought under 28 U.S. C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321 to 2325, and 5 U.S.C. §§ 1004(d) and 1009, to vacate and set aside as unlawful three orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation having its principal business office in Detroit, Michigan. It is a common carrier by motor vehicle transporting general commodities, with certain exceptions, in interstate and foreign commerce, primarily over regular routes, under the authority of Certificates of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truman Outland v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, International, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
  4. Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Resort Bus Lines, Inc. v. the Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Black Ball Freight Service v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1969
  4. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
  5. B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, (Two Cases). B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, and Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. And Hilt Truck Line, Inc., Intervenor-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API