Legal Opinion
Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 22, 1972No. 64-C-1253PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is the second time the court has been required to review the report of the Honorable Arthur H. Schwartz, the Special Master, reappointed on October 12, 1971 (1971 Decree) to hear and report and account for the amount of restitution to be paid by Skogmo to the plaintiffs and those similarly situated. The first report was filed pursuant to an order dated April 26, 1969 (1969 Decree) appointing the Honorable Arthur H. Schwartz Special Master. In this connection reference is made to the opinion of this court, dated March 7, 1969, 298 F.Supp. 66 (E.D.N.Y.1969), holding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norte & Co. v. R. L. Huffines, Jr. And Victor Muscat, and L. F. Serrick, Alfred O'gara, Edward Krock and Defiance Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- Norte & Company v. HuffinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973