Legal Opinion

Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 24, 1973No. 64-C-1253, 66-C-901Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

This is an application for counsel fees and disbursements, accountants’ fees, and expenses of certain assistants' engaged by counsel in the prosecution of a minority stockholders’ class action against Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. (“Skogmo”), arising out of a breach of fiduciary obligations by Skogmo and certain omissions and misrepresentations in proxy material delivered to stockholders of General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. by Skogmo in support of its merger with the latter corporation. The complaint demanded an accounting and restitution predicated primarily upon a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API