Legal Opinion

Heiskell v. Knox County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— R. H. Saksom, Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher

It appearing to the court that the public interest requires it, this case was advanced for hearing and was heard at Jackson on May 31,1915, as provided by law, upon the transcript of the record from Knox county chancery court, the assignments of error by appellant, reply brief thereto, and the oral argument.

It appears that defendants T. A. "Wright and others were the owners of a tract of land near Knoxville, known as the Cherokee tract, and the quarterly court of Knox county, on the first Monday in January, 1915, adopted a resolution upon a proposition made to it by the owners to buy said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohn v. KingsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ransom v. Rutherford CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. White v. HintonWyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Archibald v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. SwiggartTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greeson v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Lawrence County v. HobbsTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Evens v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API