Legal Opinion

State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. Brough

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1990No. 20222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*493OPINION

2Per curiam

The primary issue is whether respondent Chuck Brough’s refusal to submit to a blood test until he could be examined by a doctor constituted a refusal to submit to an evidentiary test for purposes of NRS Chapter 484. The district court reversed the DMV hearing officer’s order revoking Brough’s license for failure to submit to an evidentiary test. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the decision of the district court.

FACTS

On October 4, 1987, Agent Sant of the Taxi Authority informed Sergeant Peppley of the Nevada Highway Patrol that he was detaining a driver whom he believed to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Schroeder v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Galvan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Davis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. KinkadeNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API