Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1989No. 18710PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
After Nevada State Trooper Donald Fazio arrested him for driving under the influence of alcohol, appellant Charles Schroeder refused to submit to a chemical sobriety test for at least forty minutes. Schroeder told the arresting officer that he would not take any test until he spoke with his attorney. After the trooper left Schroeder in the Clark County jail and returned to his patrol, Schroeder changed his mind and requested a test. The police officer present refused to administer the test to Schroeder, and pursuant to Nevada’s implied consent law, the department of motor vehicles…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Harlan v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- State v. CorradoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- People v. ShorkeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BernhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Baldwin v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.