Legal Opinion

In Re the Mandate of Funds in the Harrison Superior Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1996No. 31S00-9611-MF-693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDATE OF FUNDS

2Per curiam

The Harrison Superior Court, Honorable Carlton Sanders, Judge, sought to increase the salaries of five court employees by means of an Ind. Trial Rule 60.5 Order for Mandate of Funds. The Harrison County Council refused to appropriate the funds. Pursuant to T.R. 60.5(B), this Court appointed the Honorable Hugo C. Songer special judge to conduct a trial on the merits of the Order. Judge Songer issued his Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, which sustained the Order for Mandate of Funds in part and overruled it in part. We affirm.

Unless waived by the parties, a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan Circuit Court v. Morgan County CouncilIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Mandate of Funds for the Brown Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Allen County Council v. Allen Circuit Court, 38th Judicial DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Order for Mandate of Funds Montgomery County Council v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Court Reporter Salaries in the Knox Circuit & Superior CourtsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. St. Joseph County Commissioners v. NemethIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gilda Orange, Members of the Common Council of the City of East Chicago, Ind. v. Hon. Sonya A. MorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Mandate of Funds St. Joseph County Commissioners and St. Joseph County Council v. The Hon. Peter J. Nemeth and the St. Joseph Probate CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API