Legal Opinion
Order for Mandate of Funds Montgomery County Council v. Milligan
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 2007No. 54S00-0611-MF-443PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Indiana Trial Rule 60.5 establishes procedures by which intra-county disagreements about court funding may be resolved. These procedures are infrequently invoked in Indiana. In this case, however, T.R. 60.5 has been called into play in a dispute about salaries for court staff in Montgomery County.
For several years, the Judges of the Montgomery Circuit Court, Montgomery Superior Court 1, and Montgomery Superior Court 2 had requested that the Montgomery County Council increase the salaries of their employees to a level that would be competitive with court staff salaries in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan Circuit Court v. Morgan County CouncilIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Vigo County Council v. Vigo Superior Court, Division 1Indiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Kramer v. Hancock County CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re the Mandate of Funds in the Harrison Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Court Reporter Salaries in the Knox Circuit & Superior CourtsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Uthman Cavallo, M.D. v. Allied Physicians of Michiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gerstbauer v. StyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Benaugh v. GarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lock Realty Corporat v. U.S. Health, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Holland v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.