Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1972No. 7211SC336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court erred in limiting defense counsel’s jury argument to thirty minutes. The assignment of error is sustained.

The record reveals that before jury arguments began defendant’s attorney requested one hour within which to argue the three felony cases against his client. The record further reveals that the court “in its discretion sets a time limit of thirty minutes to each side to which the defendant objects and excepts.”

Article IV, Sec. 13(2) of the Constitution of North Carolina provides in pertinent part as…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EurySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. EurySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API