Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bockweg v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1991No. 52PA90Published

1DissentJustice Martin

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

“Where the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, there is no room for judicial construction and the courts must give it its plain and definite meaning, and are without power to interpolate or superimpose, provisions and limitations not contained therein.”

State v. Camp, 286 N.C. 148, 152, 209 S.E.2d 754, 756 (1974) (quoting 7 Strong, N.C. Index 2d Statutes § 5 (1968)). Accord, e.g., Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Group, 493 U.S. 120, ---, 107 L. Ed. 2d 438, 445 (1989) (when interpreting a statute, “[o]ur task is to apply the text,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Blaustein v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API