Legal Opinion

State v. Eury

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 515A85PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion that both defense counsel be permitted to address the jury during defendant’s closing argument at the guilt-innocence phase of the trial.

The record in this case reflects the following exchange between the court and defense counsel Smith:

COURT: . . . How many arguments does the defendant want?

Mr. SMITH: Mr. Dillinger and I both want to argue, Your Honor, and both would like to argue after the State completes its argument.

COURT: I understand that you would but I don’t believe that is the procedure.

MR.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. . RaperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API