Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. City of Middletown
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 5, 1990No. C-1-88-0229PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS BY DEFENDANT CITY OF MIDDLE-TOWN AND DEFENDANT ERNEST HOWARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant City of Middletown’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 101) to which plaintiffs have responded (doc. 110) and the City has replied (doc. 114). Also before this Court is defendant Ernest Howard’s motion for partial summary judgment (doc. 105) to which plaintiffs have responded (doc. Ill) and Howard has replied (doc. 113). Further, plaintiffs have moved to file a supplemental memorandum opposing…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Culberson v. DoanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Missildine v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- Saal v. City of WoosterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020