Legal Opinion

Foor v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 6, 2018No. 1 CA-CV 17-0143Published

1Opinion of the Court

PERKINS, Judge:

¶ 1 Jennifer Foor appeals the superior court's order denying special action relief from an order of the Phoenix Municipal Court forfeiting Foor's cats to the City of Phoenix (the "City"). Foor argues undisclosed impeachment material pertaining to the Phoenix Police officer involved in her case amounts to a Brady violation by the City and requests the forfeiture of her cats be vacated. See Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). For the following reasons, we hold that Brady and Giglio require disclosure of material information under these…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API