Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Gagnon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 22, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-5051PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Martin Eisenberg (“Eisen-berg”) and Arthur Nissen (“Nissen”) bring this action assertedly on behalf of themselves and a class of purchasers of securities in three limited partnerships. This court has not ruled on the class action motion, but will presently rule on numerous motions by several defendants regarding the amended complaint. Defendant David Weinstein (“Weinstein”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as a Motion to Strike or For a More Definite…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.