Legal Opinion
Pasternack v. Dalo
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 13, 1955No. Civ. A. 12539PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
The following motions are before the court:
I. Motion by third-party defendants,1 Wojnicz and Kulbieda, to dismiss the action brought against them by the third-party plaintiffs, The Schreiber Transportation Company and The Schreiber Trucking Company, Inc.
II. Motion by third-party defendants, Wojnicz and Kulbieda, to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint which attempts to state a claim against them.
I
Motion by Third-Party Defendants to Dismiss Action of Third-Party Plaintiffs.
The reasons assigned to support this motion are as follows:(a) The third-party complaint fails…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Curtis Fawvor v. Texaco, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. Foster Wheeler Corporation, Third-Party B & B Insulation, Inc., Defendant-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Crawford v. LydickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1959
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Brandt v. Bay City Super MarketDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.