Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Bay City Super Market
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 27, 1960No. Civ. 7801PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff has instituted this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered by her as a result of a fall in a grocery store operated by certain of the defendants in Crescent City, California. Jurisdiction is predicated upon diversity of citizenship with the requisite amount in controversy (Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332). Defendant, Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company, has made a motion to dismiss the complaint as to it, on grounds which it is not necessary for the Court to consider at this time.
A careful examination of the file in this case leads to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- F & L DRUG CORP. v. American Central Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Lurie Company v. Loew's San Francisco Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Eubanks v. Krispy Kreme Donut Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961
- Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- Paramount Packaging Corp. v. H. B. Fuller Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.