Legal Opinion
Overend Technologies, LLC v. Invista S.ÀR.L.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 9, 2006No. 05-C-0800PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1
GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Plaintiff OverEnd Technologies, LLC, sued Defendant Invista S.ar.h, seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,676,054 (“the ’054 patent”). OverEnd also alleged, in the third count of its original complaint, that Invista violated § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, by lessening competition in the market for over-end takeoff (OETO) devices used in the disposable diaper industry. On November 8, 2005, OverEnd filed an amended complaint, which repeated the allegations of the original…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chicago Studio Rental, Incorpo v. Illinois Department of CommercCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Chicago Studio Rental, Incorpo v. Illinois Department of CommercCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Labor One, Inc. v. Staff Management Solutions, LLC, et lDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019