Legal Opinion

Clark v. Beard

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Pocahontas County. Action by Preston S. Clark against Emma C. Beard. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error,

1Opinion of the Court

Beaskox, Judge:

A motion was made to reject the evidence because the bill of exceptions does not identify it; but there is the evidence found in the bill. It is certified by the stenographer as the evidence in the case, giving names of 'witnesses, and the order of the judge showing his execution of the bill naming and identifying the witnesses, and sajdng that the evidence is duly certified by the stenographer. It is also said there was no exceptions to the decision of the judge overruling the motion for a new trial; but the bill of exceptions say there ivas.

*314This is an action of ejectment by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ritz v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hudson v. PutneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Boggess v. MeredithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Justice v. LawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. High's Heirs v. PancakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BoothWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. FreyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lynch v. BrookoverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Moore v. HendersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bumpus v. Ohio Cities Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API