Legal Opinion

High's Heirs v. Pancake

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1896PublishedCited by 22 opinions

cited 23 Gratt. 504. cited 14 W. Ya. 561; 28 W. Ya. 35; 35 W. Ya. 560; 36 W. Ya. 451; Code, c. 130, s. 5a; 1 Q-reenl. Ev. § 498.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

Harriet Higb and others instituted an action of trespass quare clausum fregit against Joseph A. Pancake to recover damages for cutting timber and taking tan bark from a tract of land claimed by plaintiffs; and the court having excluded the plaintiffs’ evidence as insufficient to support the action, the plaintiffs obtained this writ of error.

Hnder the pleadings, it fell upon the plaintiffs to show their title to the land. They claim as the fountain of their title a patent from the state of Yirginia, in 1801, to Hugh Holmes, for three thousand and five hundred and fifty acres on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. ProctorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Wilson v. Phoenix Powder Manf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Overton's heirs v. DavissonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1844
  4. Suttle v. R. F. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  5. Crothers' Adm'r v. CrothersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Delaplain v. GrubbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Edgell v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wade v. McDougleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API