Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Barrett v. Boeckeler Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 3, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto. On July 7, 1921, the Attorney-General filed his information which, with caption and signatures omitted, is as follows:
"Comes now the State of Missouri, by Jesse W. Barrett, Attorney-General, who in this behalf prosecutes for and in the name of the State of Missouri, and informs the court that the respondent Goodfellow Lumber Company is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Iowa; that the respondent St. Louis Lumber Company is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State ex inf. Crow v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- State ex rel. Major v. Arkansas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Temperato v. HorstmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. Stupp Bros. Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Reisenbichler v. Marquette Cement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.