Legal Opinion
Temperato v. Horstman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 9, 1959No. 46651PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAGER, Judge.
In this suit plaintiff sought damages for the breach of a contract which may initially be described as a “Dairy Queen” franchise for a territory in the City of St. Louis; he also sought certain injunctive relief. He recovered damages of $29,843.-60 and was given a permanent injunction. Defendants had filed counterclaims, which were ruled adversely and which will be referred to later. The case was tried to the court. After an unsuccessful motion for a new trial, defendants appealed. We would merely encumber this opinion by reciting the pleadings; they fully cover the claims and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Reddi-Wip, Inc. v. Lemay Valve CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. County of CamdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- C. C. Dillon Co. v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Morris v. RetzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.