Legal Opinion
State v. Marino
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 1989No. 6846PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered after a jury found him guilty of possession of narcotics with intent to sell, a violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).
The sole claim made by the defendant in this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence seized without a warrant and a statement made by him.1 The defendant was arrested on June 22,1987, and the police seized a certain quantity of cocaine which the defendant subsequently moved to suppress. The police had neither an arrest warrant nor a search warrant.
A search…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. GuertinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MierezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. HolderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. HollomanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. MartiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. MarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.