Legal Opinion
State v. Mierez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 7, 1991No. 9178PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a),1 and one count of possession of *545a narcotic substance, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).2 In each instance, the narcotic substance involved was cocaine.
The defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence and (2) improperly charged the jury on the crime of sale of a narcotic substance when the evidence produced by the state was insufficient to prove that crime…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. JeffreysConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. CintronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. WassilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. BowensConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.