Legal Opinion
State v. Marti
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 2005No. AC 24304PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Jose Marti, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress certain physical evidence and statements that he made to the police. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hayes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SulewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. PetersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014