Legal Opinion

CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 7, 1986No. 83-079PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff Chittenden Trust Company (the bank) appeals a judgment, after jury trial, awarding defendants $8,974.54 for conversion, $150,000 for malicious prosecution, and $12,500 in punitive damages. Defendants cross appeal the court’s denial of their motion for a new trial on their claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, following judgment for the bank on this claim. We reverse the monetary judgments and affirm the court’s denial of the motion for new trial on the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In 1972, Milo Marshall and two other individuals formed a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gerard and Gemma Brault v. Town of MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Sheltra v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Grace v. Sterling, Grace & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Ryan v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Northern Oil Company, Inc. v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Criss v. Springfield TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Fleetwood Retail Corp. of NM v. LeDouxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Peter I. Diamondstone v. Christopher A. MacAluso Leroy Prior, David R. Stanton, A. James Walton, Jr., and State of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API