Legal Opinion

Criss v. Springfield Township

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-1528PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

For the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause for a new trial.

The primary issue is whether polygraph tests given to witnesses by police officers during the course of a criminal investigation should be admissible to show the officer’s state of mind where the officer is the defendant in a malicious prosecution action. Our analysis begins with a discussion of the essential nature of the tort of malicious prosecution.

The tort of malicious criminal prosecution is the right to recover damages for the harm caused to a defendant in a criminal case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Trussell v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brown v. Monticello State Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Harris v. BornhorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API