Criss v. Springfield Township
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
For the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause for a new trial.
The primary issue is whether polygraph tests given to witnesses by police officers during the course of a criminal investigation should be admissible to show the officer’s state of mind where the officer is the defendant in a malicious prosecution action. Our analysis begins with a discussion of the essential nature of the tort of malicious prosecution.
The tort of malicious criminal prosecution is the right to recover damages for the harm caused to a defendant in a criminal case…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Trussell v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Monticello State Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Harris v. BornhorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Jeffrey Swiecicki v. Jose DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Cody Jones v. City of Elyria, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.