Legal Opinion

Bosquet v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1997No. CA CR 92-89PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

The appellant, Mary Bousquet, was convicted in a jury trial of two counts of delivering a controlled substance (cocaine), for which she was sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen years in prison.1 She contends on appeal that the trial court erred in allowing the State to exercise its peremptory challenges to exclude black persons in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). We find no merit in her argument and affirm.

As an initial matter, we note that the “venerable practice” of peremptory challenges is designed to promote the goal of fairness injury trials.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. State v. PaleoArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. MacKintrush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API