State v. Paleo
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to decide whether the waiver of peremptory strikes during jury selection is sufficient alone to constitute a prima facie case of discrimination under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We conclude that, while waiver may be a relevant circumstance in establishing a prima facie case, it is insufficient standing alone.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 A jury found Joseph Paleo guilty of aggravated D.U.I. He claims that the state violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by waiving two of the six peremptory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Avery v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Osbaldo Esparza-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. AmersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. LuceroColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DewakukuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. FortuneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.