Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Richtarsic

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 31, 1941No. 540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiffs Thomas F. O’Brien and Margaret R. O’Brien, and the defendant Agnes Richtarsic are residents of this District. The defendant Alric C. Lindholm is not a resident of the District and resides in Pennsylvania. The defendant Lindholm was served with a summons and complaint in Pennsylvania. Upon motion the action was dismissed as against the defendant Lindholm on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction because the summons was served outside of this District. Thereafter on motion of the defendant Agnes Richtarsic an order was granted making the defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Malkin v. Arundel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  3. Tullgren v. JasperDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  4. Bossard v. McGwinnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Gibbs v. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Manternach v. Jones County Farm Service CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1957
  3. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  4. Saba v. Emil Katz & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Thompson v. Temple Cotton Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API