Legal Opinion
Saba v. Emil Katz & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 4, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the third-party defendants, Rudolph Quittner and Marianna Quittner, doing business under the name of Victory Fabrics Company, as successor to Victory Fabrics Corporation, to dismiss the third-party complaint as to them on the ground that as there is no diversity of citizenship between the third-party plaintiff and these third-party defendants, this court lacks jurisdiction.
The third-party defendants have been brought in by an ex parte order under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
There is no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Bossard v. McGwinnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hoskie v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
- Schram v. RoneyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. De HavenDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
- Braun v. Hecht Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Goodard v. Shasta S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1949
- Yap v. FergusonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.