Legal Opinion

Arthur Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1998No. 97-3939PublishedCited by 282 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Arthur Fallick has been an employee of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Nationwide Life Insurance Company, for more than 25 years. As a Nationwide employee, Fallick was and is both a “participant” and a “beneficiary” of the Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Employee Health Care Plan, an employee medical benefit plan governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Nationwide was the fiduciary of that Plan, which was part of a group plan covering…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by282 opinions

  1. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Delvin C. Payton v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API