Legal Opinion

Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1947No. 30735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Under the policy of insurance in issue the defendant agreed to pay to the insured’s beneficiaries the sum of $5,000 upon receipt of due proof of the insured’s death, or $10,000 upon due proof that such death resulted from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means. The policy provides further that if the insured is total ly and presumably permanently disabled before tbe age of 60 years, tbe insurer will pay tbe insured $50 monthly during such disability, increasing after five and ten years continuous disability, etc.

It is stated in the policy:

“This policy is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Blackburn v. Home Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Pratt v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Maynard v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Prudential Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API