Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1953No. 33150Published

1ConcurrenceTaft, J.

What is meant by the words “the reserve * * * on the policy” is clarified by the subsequent words of the provision required by sub-paragraph (7) of Section 9420, General Code, relative to ‘ ‘ specifying the mortality table and rate of interest adopted for computing such reserve.” It is possible to compute mathematically the amount of a reserve with respect to the life insurance feature of such a policy by using a mortality tabie and a rate of interest and other factors necessarily specified in the policy, such .as the amount payable on death and the amounts of and times for payment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API