Legal Opinion

Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1953No. 33150Published

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

Fortunately the facts are not in dispute, and the single question of law is clearly defined.

*168The policy held by the plaintiff is entitled “Limited Payment Life Policy with Double Indemnity for Death by Accident and Increasing Total and Permanent Disability Benefits,” and is in the face amount of $5,000. The premiums thereon have been paid, and the policy is in full force and effect.

This controversy arises by reason of the fact that the defendant company has established a separate reserve against each of the three features of the policy —(1) life insurance, (2) disability benefits, and (3)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chastang v. Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API