Legal Opinion

State v. Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1981No. 8026SC607PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute expeditiously. He contends that he was denied his right to due process under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States as a result of the 367-day delay from the time of the occurrence of the alleged drug sale until his first apprisal of the charges lodged against him arising out of that event. He maintains that the State’s delay was intentional and resulted in prejudice to his defense.

Defendant alleges that the prejudice to his case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Sanderson v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API