Legal Opinion

State v. Danielson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2012No. 26055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] A jury found Trent Danielson guilty of perjury. Danielson appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict, the trial court erred in denying his motion for a court-appointed private investigator, and the court erred in denying a motion in limine and admitting used transmission parts into evidence. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Rocket Lube of Spearfish, South Dakota, hired Danielson as a mechanic and automobile painter in 2003. Rocket Lube fired Danielson in 2006, claiming that Dan-ielson stole auto parts and did not remit checks for work done…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. GoodroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Tolver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GuthmillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. RileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. HannemannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API