Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2013No. 26354PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilberston, Chief Justice

(on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] James Riley was convicted by a jury of possessing child pornography in violation of SDCL 22-24A-3(3) and was sentenced to eight years in the penitentiary. Riley now appeals his conviction, arguing the evidence was insufficient to establish he possessed child pornography. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] To combat Internet-based child exploitation and abuse, the South Dakota Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (Task Force) conducts undercover online investigations to identify individuals distributing or possessing child pornography. Detectives from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ChippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. AhmedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. FalkenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API