Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 31, 1983No. 81SA415PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Senator Ralph Cole (appellant) appeals a declaratory judgment which held that legislative caucus meetings are subject to the Colorado Open Meetings Law, sections 24-6-401 & -402, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.Yol. 10). Appellant argues that the Open Meetings Law is not applicable to legislative caucus meetings. Alternatively, appellant asserts that, even if this court finds that legislative caucuses are policy-making bodies subject to the Open Meetings Law, requiring that legislative caucus meetings be open to the public both conflicts with Article V of the Colorado Constitution and deprives…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Board of County Commissioners, Costilla County v. Costilla County Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Abood v. League of Women Voters of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gumina v. City of SterlingColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Asgeirsson v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API