Abood v. League of Women Voters of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
These appeals arise from the superior court’s decision that a claim that certain groups of state legislators held closed committee meetings and caucuses in violation of the Open Meetings Act was not justicia-ble, but that a claim that the closed meetings violated an implied constitutional right of public access to meetings of legislative units was both justiciable and correct. We agree that the claim of violation of the Open Meetings Act by state legislators is nonjusticiable, but contrary to the superior court’s decision, we hold that there is no implied right of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Board of Trustees v. Attorney General of the CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.