Stellar v. Long
Superior Court of Delaware
Appeal by Frederick Stellar from a. judgment rendered against him by a justice of the peace in favor of Eugene Long. On motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the certificate of the justice to the transcript of the record filed did not meet the requirements of Section 3987, Revised Code of 1915. Lewis v. Hazel, 4 Harr. 470; Barker v. David, 4 Penn. 395, 55 Ail. 334; Peninsula Cut Stone Co. v. Nixon, 3 Boyce 339, 83 Ail. 1081. The certificate was as follows: “I…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Frederick Stellar from a. judgment rendered against him by a justice of the peace in favor of Eugene Long. On motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the certificate of the justice to the transcript of the record filed did not meet the requirements of Section 3987, Revised Code of 1915. Lewis v. Hazel, 4 Harr. 470; Barker v. David, 4 Penn. 395, 55 Ail. 334; Peninsula Cut Stone Co. v. Nixon, 3 Boyce 339, 83 Ail. 1081. The certificate was as follows: “I hereby certify that the within is a true transcript of all my entries in the above case. As witness my hand and seal,” etc.…
1Opinion of the Court
Conrad, J.:
We overrule the motion to dismiss the appeal, holding that the court, in Marshall v. Reed, 5 Penn. 462, 61 Atl. 945, virtually covered this point.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marshall v. ReedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Gray v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1927
- Floyd v. LipkaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
- Jewell v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Kent v. ParkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.